From CollabLandWiki
University of British Columbia
Positive and Negative Aspects of the University of British Columbia Case Study
Positive
- Have an easy to follow layout for the case study.
- Environmental considerations are well thought through in regards to energy, air quality, solid wastes, water, soils, and recycling.
- Different trees are to be used in a coherent and contextually relevant way. It is looked at through the lens of maintenance, diversity, and context.
- They are trying to provide landscape furniture in all social spaces. This includes benches, waste receptacles, bike racks, and drinking fountains.
- They are continuing and expanding the commemoration of UBC’s people and events in the landscape.
- They are trying to establish the university landscape as a place for learning.
- They provide graphs that demonstrate the ecology around the university.
- Ensuring that the walkways around the campus are well lit.
- They show the relationship of roadways, buildings, parking lots, green space, and sidewalks graphically.
Negative
- Could have shown a better campus map.
- Could have discussed the importance of a recognizable entrance more.
Similarities
- They are developing renovations over time, and prioritizing the schedule for it.
- Unifying the university landscape.
- Attract attention to the university.
- Inspire donations specifically for landscape stewardship and renovations.
- Industry standards will be implemented.
- Addressing maintenance deferral.
- Creating a cohesive landscape with existing features at the university.
Differences
- UBC is looking at more than doubling the amount of art and sculptures around the campus
- UBC is providing proper direction with signs and pathways as apposed to the Valley City campus.
- UBC is relating the campus with the surrounding city.
- UBC has accommodated the potential for proper expansion.
- UBC is interconnecting areas for social activities.
- UBC is trying to reinforce the idea of the U as a botanical garden. VCS isn’t much for a botanical garden.